Processing and Software Building 39: Atreus and Reveos

Automated component processing is an almost hands-free separation of into packed RBCs (ready for leukodepletion), buffy coat platelets (ready for pooling), leukodepleted plasma, and a residual buffy coat.  The older Atreus device takes about 10 minutes for one whole blood unit whereas the newer Reveos device needs slightly more than 20 minutes to process four whole blood units.  At the end of processing:

  1. RBCs are ready for leukodepletion using the integral filter provided with the kit.
  2. Plasma is ready for pathogen-inactivation and freezing.
  3. Buffy coat platelets are ready for pooling using the Platelet Yield Index PYI.
    1. Further processing (filtration and Mirasol treatment) occurs if the donor marker testing results pass
  4. Residual buffy coat is not a clinical product but may be used for quality control for stem cell processing and/or cell line expansion

The process in Medinfo is as follows:

  1. Receive the whole blood units for processing by reading the ISBT specimen barcode.
  2. Collection data (volume, time to complete collection, time of collection, etc.) is transferred to the component processor.
  3. Select the processing machine:  Atreus vs. Reveos
  4. Select the protocol:  2C (RBCs and plasma) versus 3C (RBCs, platelets, and plasma)
  5. Further processing as per the flow diagrams.

At HMC Doha, Medinfo developed the first bidirectional interfaces to both Reveos and Atreus.

To Be Continued

2/9/20

Advanced Hematology Resident Training in Donor Center and Apheresis

Objectives:

  1. Donor criteria based on AABB standards
    1. Is it safe for the donor to donate?
    2. Medical history
      1. Current medical conditions
      2. Past medical conditions
  2. Medications
  3. Vaccinations
  4. Travel history
  5. High-risk behaviors
  6. SARS/MERS
  7. COVID-19 convalescent plasma CCP
  8. Prion diseases
  9. Donor medical examination
  10. Is it safe for the recipient to receive the donor’s blood?
  11. Donor registration issues
    1. Positive identification
    2. Donor deferral database
  12. Donor phlebotomy
    1. Safe volume to donate
    2. Anticoagulant-preservative solutions
    3. Time limit for phlebotomy
    4. Post-donation care
  13. Donor reactions—Dx and Rx of the following:
    1. Vasovagal
    2. Seizures
    3. Air embolism
    4. Arterial stick
    5. Hematoma
  14. Donor Apheresis
    1. Plateletpheresis
    2. Plasmapheresis
    3. Plateletpheresis with concurrent plasma collection
    4. RBC collection
    5. Combined platelet, plasma, and RBC collection
  15. Autologous donation
    1. Predeposit
    2. Perioperative
    3. Intraoperative
    4. Postoperative
  16. Donor self-deferral
  17. Therapeutic Phlebotomy
  18. Therapeutic Apheresis
    1. Therapeutic plasma exchange/plasmapheresis
    2. Leukapheresis
    3. Thrombapheresis
    4. Red cell exchange
    5. Stem cell collection
    6. Column absorption technologies
    7. Clinical indications
    8. Writing orders for above procedures
  19. Component Processing:
    1. Manual
    2. Automated—Reveos
    3. Pathogen Inactivation Mirasol
    4. Buffy coat vs classic platelet-rich plasma platelets and pools
    5. Platelet Additive Solution PAS
    6. FFP, FP24, thawed plasma
    7. Cryoprecipitate
    8. Cryo-poor plasma (plasma, cryoprecipitate-removed)
    9. COVID-19 convalescent plasma CCP

Clinical Responsibilities (after proven competence):

  1. Triage of donor requests
  2. Handling of donor reactions
  3. Approval of therapeutic phlebotomies
  4. Assistance with therapeutic apheresis

Assessments:

  1. Pre-training/baseline
  2. Competency documentation for clinical responsibilities (#11 above)
  3. Post-training

Working Hours:

  1. 0900-1700, Saturday through Wednesday
  2. Must carry pager for clinical responsibilities

Reviewed 17/8/20

Processes and Software Building 38: Component Processing Overview

As with each major area of Transfusion Medicine, a current state is captured.  From this, a future state overview is then developed.

At this time, the client should study his current state and the future state and see how he can bolster the critical control points and build them into the processes.

In this series of posts, we will consider:

  1. Component production by Reveos automated component processing
  2. Component production by Atreus automated component processing—replaced by Reveos
  3. Manual component processing
  4. RBC leukodepletion
  5. Platelet pooling
  6. Mirasol pathogen inactivation for platelets and plasma
  7. Platelet production with platelet additive solution PAS
  8. Cryoprecipitate and cryo-poor plasma production
  9. Labelling

The example of current and future state shown is what Medinfo and I built for HMC Doha:

To Be Continued

1/9/20

Basic Hematology Fellowship Rotation in Transfusion Medicine

Objectives:

  1. Donor Center
    1. Donor eligibility criteria
    2. Whole blood collection
    3. Donor apheresis (platelets, plasma, dual-RBC)
    4. Donor reactions
  2. Therapeutic Apheresis
    1. Plasma exchange
    2. Leukocyte reduction—stem cell collection
    3. Reductive thrombapheresis
    4. RBC exchange
    5. Column-absorption procedures including phototherapy
  3. Component Preparation
    1. Preparation and release issues
  4. Transfusion Service:
    1. Blood component therapy
    2. RBC blood groups
    3. Compatibility Testing
    4. Antibody Identification and clinical significance
    5. Transfusion reactions
    6. Direct antiglobulin test clinical significance
    7. Drug-related hemolysis

Venue:

TMS Donor and Transfusion Services

Conducted by:  Head, TMS, and senior TMS technical staff

Evaluation:

Discussion of topics with TMS Head and written final examination

Source Materials:

  1. Technical Manual, AABB
  2. Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, AABB
  3. Apheresis, Principles and Practice, AABB

This is a full-time, one-month rotation—attendance in mandatory.  Vacations should NOT be taken during this rotation.

Originally Prepared for NGHA Riyadh 31/3/09

Reviewed 26/8/20

Projective Assessment 4

As a transfusion medicine physician, I must know if I can trust my staff’s interpretation of immunohematology testing.  I may be called at night and they will provide me with results and I must use these to make a medical judgment.  If their interpretation is flawed, I might make a decision that harms the patient.

I really don’t like multiple-choice questions, but nowadays this is often the norm.  For my staff, especially senior staff and those who want to be promoted to senior staff, I have developed a series of projective exercises to help me understand their thought processes.

Here is another exercise, usually given to base medical technologists.  I have the staff review this panel and tell me to interpret it:

You just can’t solve this without the enzyme panel.  Will the staff member ask for this?  Will he note that the one cell reacting is homozygous for E?  Will he ask for extended antigen typing (the patient is R1R1)?

Processes and Software Building 37: Donor Marker Testing–Final Comments

This series of the processes for donor marker testing has demonstrated the complexity and flexibility of designing processes.  In Medinfo, you can custom-design the criteria based on your local, national, and international requirements.  The end-user client must specify what he wants, and I reiterate:  Be careful what you ask for, you may get it.  Seek assistance if you are uncertain of what to use.

My criteria were based on several international standards, e.g. AABB, US FDA, CE, and Australian.  I strongly recommend you start with a set of standards and localize it for your needs.

For example, US FDA/AABB do not have a screening criteria for brucellosis since it is rare in their jurisdiction.  However, it is relatively common in the Middle East so I added a donor screening question for it.  International AABB does allow for variance with US FDA criteria so if you are outside the USA, embrace this.  The advantage of customizable software allows you do localize it to your needs.  A turnkey system, e.g. from the USA, may not allow such changes.

Finally, there are emerging pathogens that are constantly changing the donor criteria (e.g. SARS-CoV-2, MERS, SARS, Zika).  The software must be robust and allow rapid alteration to meet new donor screening criteria.  This is a constant uphill battle and requires a lot of time to keep up and validate any changes.

Complete Interim Policy on Marker Testing

For your reference, the following is the complete set of marker testing algorithms I used just before I left HMC Doha:

Definitions:

Positive result for EIA means S/CO ratio >= 1.0

Positive result for LIA means particular pattern of bands as defined by the manufacturer

Indeterminate result for LIA means presence of bands not meeting positive criteria

  1. Hepatitis B:
    1. HBsAg non-negative, then:
      1. HBsAg positive with HBsAg confirmatory positive, regardless of other results:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      2. HBsAg positive with HBsAg confirmatory borderline or negative, repeat all HBV testing after 8 weeks
      3. HBsAg borderline:  repeat all HBV testing after 8 weeks
      4. HBV-DNA positive confirmed, regardless of other results:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
    2. If HBcAb positive, repeat after 8 weeks
    3. Repeat Hepatitis B Testing After 8 weeks:
      1. HBsAg positive with HBsAg confirmatory positive:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      2. HBsAg positive with HBsAg confirmatory borderline or negative:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      3. HBsAg borderline, permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      4. HBV-DNA positive confirmed:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      5. HBcAb positive or borderline with negative HBsAg and negative HBV-DNA:  review HBsAb level:
        1. If HBsAb level >= 100 mIU/mL (100 IU/L), donor may be reentered
        2. If HBsAb level < 100, then recommend to donor to receive booster HBV vaccine
          1. After HBV vaccine administration, retest after 30 days:
            1. If HBsAb level >= 100, donor may be reentered
            2. If HBsAb level < 100, donor is indefinitely deferred
      6. HBsAg, HBcAb, HBsAb all negative:  reenter into donor pool
  • Hepatitis C:
    • HCV-RNA positive confirmed, regardless of other HCV results:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
    • HCV-RNA borderline:  repeat all HCV testing after 6 months
    • HCV-InnoLIA positive, regardless of other HCV results:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
    • HCV-InnoLIA indeterminate:  repeat all HCV testing after 6 months
    • HCV-Ab positive, HCV-RNA negative, do HCV-InnoLIA:
      • If HCV-InnoLIA positive, permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      • If HCV-InnoLIA indeterminate or negative, repeat all HCV testing after 6 months
    • Repeat Hepatitis C Testing After 6 months:
      • HCV-RNA or HCV-InnoLIA positive:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      • HCV-RNA or HCV-InnoLIA borderline:  permanent deferral, HCV infection not confirmed
      • HCV-Ab positive or borderline without positive HCV-RNA or positive HCV-InnoLIA:  permanent deferral, HCV infection not confirmed
      • HCV-Ab negative, HCV-RNA negative, HCV-InnoLIA negative:  reenter donor into donor pool
  • HIV Testing:
    • HIV-RNA positive confirmed, regardless of other HIV results:  permanent deferral and do HIV-InnoLIA, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
    • HIV-RNA borderline:  do HIV-InnoLIA
    • HIV-InnoLIA positive, regardless of other HIV results:  refer to Infectious Disease clinic
    • HIV-InnoLIA indeterminate:  repeat all HIV testing after 8 weeks
    • HIV Ab positive with negative HIV-RNA and/or borderline/negative HIV-InnoLIA:  repeat testing after 8 weeks
    • Repeat HIV Testing After 8 Weeks:
      • HIV RNA positive and/or HIV-InnoLIA positive, regardless of other HIV results:  refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      • HIV-InnoLIA and/or HIV antibodies indeterminate:  permanent deferral, HIV infection not confirmed
      • HIV Ab negative and HIV-RNA negative and HIV-InnoLIA negative:  reenter into donor pool
  • HTLV 1/2 Testing:
    • HTLV Antibodies positive, then do HTLV-InnoLIA:
      • HTLV InnoLIA positive for HTLV-1 and/or HTLV-2:  refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      • HTLV InnoLIA indeterminate or negative, repeat HTLV Ab and HTLV InnoLIA testing after 6 months
    • Repeat HTLV Testing After 6 Months:
      • HTLV 1/2 antibodies positive, permanent deferral and do HTLV InnoLIA
      • HTLV 1/2 antibodies indeterminate,  permanent deferral and do HTLV InnoLIA
      • HTLV InnoLIA positive for HTLV-1 or HTLV-2: refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      • HTLV InnoLIA indeterminate, donor permanently deferred.
        • Issue letter HTLV-Not Confirmed
      • HTLV 1/2 Ab negative and HTLV InnoLIA negative, reenter donor.
  • Malaria Testing:
    • Defer donor if he has been in malarial endemic zone within the past 3 months
    • If travel to malarial zone > 3 months, do malarial antibody testing:
      • Malaria antibody negative:  no deferral
      • Malaria antibody positive, perform malarial antigen test:
        • Malaria antigen test positive, refer to Infectious Disease clinic—defer until 3 years after cessation of treatment
        • Malaria antigen test negative:
          • Plasma may be collected
          • RBCs and platelets must be destroyed.
        • Repeat malarial antibodies after 3 years:
          • If malarial antibody test positive, donor must not be used for RBC components but may be used for plasma production
          • If malarial antibody test negative, reenter donor for all components
    • Defer donor if he has received malarial treatment (not prophylaxis) for 3 years
      • Perform both malarial antibody and antigen testing:
        • Defer based on section 5.2
  • Syphilis Testing:
    • Syphilis Ab test positive or indeterminate:  do InnoLIA-Syphilis test
      • InnoLIA-Syphilis test positive:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      • InnoLIA-Syphilis test borderline or negative:  defer for 1 year, then repeat all syphilis testing.
    • Repeat Syphilis Testing after 1 Year:
      • Syphilis antibody testing negative, reenter into donor pool
      • Syphilis antibody positive or borderline:  do InnoLIA-Syphilis test
        • InnoLIA-Syphilis test positive:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
        • If InnoLIA-Syphilis borderline or negative:  permanent deferral, syphilis not confirmed

References:

  1. Revised Recommendations to Reduce the Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Malaria, Guidance for the Industry, US Department of Health and Human Services, FDA, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research CBER, April, 2020
  2. Use of Serologic Tests to Reduce the Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Viruses Types I and II, Final Guidance for Industry, February 2020
  3. Draft Guidance for Industry:  Recommendations for Requalification of Blood Donors Deferred Because of Reactive Test Results for Antibodies to Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Types I and II (anti-HTLV-I/II), CBER, September 2018
  4. Guidance for Industry:  Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV): Testing, Product Disposition, and Donor Deferral and Reentry, US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research CBER, May 2010
  5. Guidance for Industry:  Requalification Method for Reentry of Blood Donors Deferred Because of Reactive Test Results for Antibody to Hepatitis B Core Antigen (Anti-HBc), US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research CBER, May 2010
  6. Product inserts, InnoLIA-Syphilis/HCV/HIV/HTLV, Immunogenetics, Singapore
  7. Malaria Section, Australian Red Cross brochure, 2007

25/8/20

Processes and Software Building 36: Donor Nucleic Acid Testing

In Medinfo, criteria for donor screening may be based on one test (e.g. Hgb), a group of tests taken together (HBsAg, HBcAb, HBsAb), or separate sets of donor testing criteria.  Nucleic Acid Testing NAT is considered separate from the EIA, LIA, and Ag tests.  In any case, when there is a combination of both acceptable and deferrable results, the longest deferral is applied as the deferral or contraindication, e.g. a temporary deferral is replaced by a permanent deferral.

Our NAT testing at HMC Doha consisted of a combination combo test.  If this was non-negative, then individual HIV 1-2, HCV, and HBV NAT testing were performed.  For speed, we used single-well testing for each donor.  However, it is very easy to build pooling into the algorithm if that is preferred by the client:

To Be Continued:

24/8/20

Projective Assessment 3

As a transfusion medicine physician, I must know if I can trust my staff’s interpretation of immunohematology testing.  I may be called at night and they will provide me with results and I must use these to make a medical judgment.  If their interpretation is flawed, I might make a decision that harms the patient.

I really don’t like multiple-choice questions, but nowadays this is often the norm.  For my staff, especially senior staff and those who want to be promoted to senior staff, I have developed a series of projective exercises to help me understand their thought processes.

Here is another exercise, usually given to base medical technologists.  I have the staff review this panel and tell me to interpret it:

Everyone reports this is anti-S, enzyme-labile, but relatively few bother to ask for the S phenotype.  All were trained to check the phenotype as part of the workup.  I also had a version of this examination in which I only showed the AHG results.  Many did not ask to perform enzyme.

The proper answer was probable anti-S, enzyme-labile, but request S phenotype. If the enzyme had not been performed, then the enzyme panel results should be requested.

Processes and Software Building 35: Donor Malaria Test Screening

Processes and Software Building—Part 35:

Malaria Testing Donor Screening Process

Zeyd Merenkov, MD, FCAP, FASCP

Independent Consultant in Transfusion Medicine and Information Technology

The malaria screening varies considerably by country.  I chose for Qatar to follow a combination of WHO and Australian guidelines as per the attached criteria.  We used a malaria antibody screen and malaria antigen test.  There are many alternate approaches, including using a malaria NAT.  The actual specification was:

  1. Malaria Testing:
    1. Defer donor if he has been in malarial endemic zone within the past 3 months
    2. If travel to malarial zone > 3 months, do malarial antibody testing:
      1. Malaria antibody negative:  no deferral
      2. Malaria antibody positive, perform malarial antigen test:
        1. Malaria antigen test positive, refer to Infectious Disease clinic—defer until 3 years after cessation of treatment
        2. Malaria antigen test negative:
          1. Plasma may be collected
          2. RBCs and platelets must be destroyed.
        3. Repeat malarial antibodies after 3 years:
          1. If malarial antibody test positive, donor must not be used for RBC components but may be used for plasma production
          2. If malarial antibody test negative, reenter donor for all components
    3. Defer donor if he has received malarial treatment (not prophylaxis) for 3 years
      1. After 3 years, perform both malarial antibody and antigen testing:
        1. Defer based on section 5.2

The Medinfo testing algorithm follows:

To Be Continued:

22/8/20

Projective Exercise 2

As a transfusion medicine physician, I must know if I can trust my staff’s interpretation of immunohematology testing.  I may be called at night and they will provide me with results and I must use these to make a medical judgment.  If their interpretation is flawed, I might make a decision that harms the patient.

I really don’t like multiple-choice questions, but nowadays this is often the norm.  For my staff, especially senior staff and those who want to be promoted to senior staff, I have developed a series of projective exercises to help me understand their thought processes.

Here is another exercise, usually given to base medical technologists.  I have the staff review this panel and tell me to interpret it:

Many staff called this anti-E and anti-c.  They did not note that there is no E-positive c-negative cell.  Also, many did not see that one c-positive cell had no reaction—they did not notice that the c was heterozygous (C+c+ not c+c+).

A medical technologist must not be sloppy, but rather very meticulous.  If there are discrepancies in the panel, they must rule out dosage, zygosity, etc.  They should not name an antibody specificity with only one antigen-positive cell.

To Be Continued:

22/8/20