Active Inventory Management: Further Discussion

Yesterday’s post showed my active blood inventory management scheme for my previous position in Qatar.  I thought today I would elaborate on how I adjust the inventory based on critical shortages and planning for disasters and other major events.

I always review the critical shortages to check for atypical usage (e.g. a disaster situation) or production issues (equipment breakdown, shortage of donors during holiday period).

If it is due to increased utilization, I try to adjust the critical and desirable inventories upward to cover the shortfall for future events.  However, it is not always possible if the event is a one-of-a-kind situation unlikely to recur.  Also, I must take into account the available resources (supplies, kits, manpower, equipment) to see if I can cope with the increase.

If it is due to resource issues, I see if I can bolster those by recommending increases or improving utilization of what is available.

Very important is through-put:  How quickly can I produce components from whole blood or apheresis components?  This was one of the major reasons we shifted away from PCR to other NAT testing with single-well processes since to minimize the need to make additional runs (Grifols Panther System).  Also, automated component processing can greatly speed production (one Reveos can process four whole blood units in about 23 minutes or about 12 units in 75 minutes.)  Those staff can be busy with other tasks while the machines are working.

In the system I developed in Qatar, we could complete processing into components (RBCs, buffy coat platelet pools, leukodepleted plasma)–Reveos 3C Program, all marker and immunohematology testing, leukoreduction of the pools and RBCs, Mirasol pathogen inactivation, and platelet additive solution in as little as five hours!!  There is great need for speed in a place that must be 100% self-sufficient in all blood components. We could even further reduce the total processing time if we only made RBCs and plasma, Reveos 2C Program

In rapid turn-around events, it is most helpful to have a robust blood bank computer system that can scale to the challenge.  Also, it must mercilessly enforce all the rules starting with donor qualification, screening, collection through testing and production.  At times of emergency, it is difficult to meet Good Manufacturing Processes manually.

After each major shortage, I recommend a “post-mortem” analysis of the situation with senior donor and quality staff to analyze our processes and see if we can further optimize them for the future.  A report is prepared and reviewed by me as the Division Head/Medical Director of the Blood Bank.  If possible, we implement our recommendations.  If not, I request additional resources from the Administration.

As regards Disaster Planning, I always asked Administration how many victims did they want to save?  When I got the response, I always try to adjust inventory by two extra RBCs and one adult platelet dose (> 2E11) per salvageable victim.  This may come at the expense of increased wastage, especially in a region that cannot export the excess, unused stock.

The exasperating issue is that I didn’t get a clear answer on this last point.  What number should I use?  I made a spreadsheet showing calculations for a variety of endpoints, e.g. 100, 500, 1000 treatable victims and sent this to Administration to consider.

Abnormal Marker Testing Algorithm

At the time this was written, West Nile Virus WNV, Chikungunya, Dengue, and Zika virus were not considered as high-risk and no testing was done on the blood supply for them. There were policies to check donor history and ask questions about each of these agents.

Note that we used a linear immunoblot assay for HIV 1/2, HCV, HTLV 1/2, and syphilis.

Definitions:

Positive result for EIA means S/CO ratio >= 1.0

Positive result for LIA (linear immunoblot assay) means particular pattern of bands as defined by the manufacturer

Indeterminate result for LIA means presence of bands not meeting positive criteria

  • Hepatitis B:
    1. HBsAg non-negative, then:
      1. HBsAg positive with HBsAg confirmatory positive, regardless of other results:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      2. HBsAg positive with HBsAg confirmatory borderline or negative, repeat all HBV testing after 8 weeks
      3. HBsAg borderline:  repeat all HBV testing after 8 weeks
      4. HBV-DNA positive confirmed, regardless of other results:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
    2. If HBcAb positive, repeat after 8 weeks
    3. Repeat Hepatitis B Testing After 8 weeks:
      1. HBsAg positive with HBsAg confirmatory positive:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      2. HBsAg positive with HBsAg confirmatory borderline or negative:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      3. HBsAg borderline, permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      4. HBV-DNA positive confirmed:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      5. HBcAb positive or borderline with negative HBsAg and negative HBV-DNA:  review HBsAb level:
        1. If HBsAb level >= 100 mIU/mL (100 IU/L), donor may be reentered
        2. If HBsAb level < 100, then recommend to donor to receive booster HBV vaccine
          1. After HBV vaccine administration, retest after 30 days:
            1. If HBsAb level >= 100, donor may be reentered
            2. If HBsAb level < 100, donor is indefinitely deferred
      6. HBsAg, HBcAb, HBsAb all negative:  reenter into donor pool
  • Hepatitis C:
    1. HCV-RNA positive confirmed, regardless of other HCV results:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
    2. HCV-RNA borderline:  repeat all HCV testing after 6 months
    3. HCV-InnoLIA positive, regardless of other HCV results:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
    4. HCV-InnoLIA indeterminate:  repeat all HCV testing after 6 months
    5. HCV-Ab positive, HCV-RNA negative, do HCV-InnoLIA:
      1. If HCV-InnoLIA positive, permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      2. If HCV-InnoLIA indeterminate or negative, repeat all HCV testing after 6 months
    6. Repeat Hepatitis C Testing After 6 months:
      1. HCV-RNA or HCV-InnoLIA positive:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      2. HCV-RNA or HCV-InnoLIA borderline:  permanent deferral, HCV infection not confirmed
      3. HCV-Ab positive or borderline without positive HCV-RNA or positive HCV-InnoLIA:  permanent deferral, HCV infection not confirmed
      4. HCV-Ab negative, HCV-RNA negative, HCV-InnoLIA negative:  reenter donor into donor pool
  • HIV Testing:
    1. HIV-RNA positive confirmed, regardless of other HIV results:  permanent deferral and do HIV-InnoLIA, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
    2. HIV-RNA borderline:  do HIV-InnoLIA
    3. HIV-InnoLIA positive, regardless of other HIV results:  refer to Infectious Disease clinic
    4. HIV-InnoLIA indeterminate:  repeat all HIV testing after 8 weeks
    5. HIV Ab positive with negative HIV-RNA and/or borderline/negative HIV-InnoLIA:  repeat testing after 8 weeks
    6. Repeat HIV Testing After 8 Weeks:
      1. HIV RNA positive and/or HIV-InnoLIA positive, regardless of other HIV results:  refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      2. HIV-InnoLIA and/or HIV antibodies indeterminate:  permanent deferral, HIV infection not confirmed
      3. HIV Ab negative and HIV-RNA negative and HIV-InnoLIA negative:  reenter into donor pool
  • HTLV 1/2 Testing:
    1. HTLV Antibodies positive, then do HTLV-InnoLIA:
      1. HTLV InnoLIA positive for HTLV-1 and/or HTLV-2:  refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      2. HTLV InnoLIA indeterminate or negative, repeat HTLV Ab and HTLV InnoLIA testing after 6 months
    2. Repeat HTLV Testing After 6 Months:
      1. HTLV 1/2 antibodies positive, permanent deferral and do HTLV InnoLIA
      2. HTLV 1/2 antibodies indeterminate,  permanent deferral and do HTLV InnoLIA
      3. HTLV InnoLIA positive for HTLV-1 or HTLV-2: refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      4. HTLV InnoLIA indeterminate, donor permanently deferred.
        • Issue letter HTLV-Not Confirmed
      5. HTLV 1/2 Ab negative and HTLV InnoLIA negative, reenter donor.
  • Malaria Testing:
    1. Defer donor if he has been in malarial endemic zone within the past 4 months
    2. If travel to malarial zone > 4 months, do malarial antibody testing:
      1. Malaria antibody negative:  no deferral
      2. Malaria antibody positive, perform malarial antigen test:
        1. Malaria antigen test positive, refer to Infectious Disease clinic—defer until 3 years after cessation of treatment
        2. Malaria antigen test negative:
          1. Plasma may be collected
          2. RBCs and platelets must be destroyed.
        3. Repeat malarial antibodies after 3 years:
          1. If malarial antibody test positive, donor must not be used for RBC components but may be used for plasma production
          2. If malarial antibody test negative, reenter donor for all components
    3. Defer donor if he has received malarial treatment (not prophylaxis) for 3 years
      1. Perform both malarial antibody and antigen testing:
        1. Defer based on section 5.2
  • Syphilis Testing:
    1. Syphilis Ab test positive or indeterminate:  do InnoLIA-Syphilis test
      1. InnoLIA-Syphilis test positive:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
      2. InnoLIA-Syphilis test borderline or negative:  defer for 1 year, then repeat all syphilis testing.
    2. Repeat Syphilis Testing after 1 Year:
      1. Syphilis antibody testing negative, reenter into donor pool
      2. Syphilis antibody positive or borderline:  do InnoLIA-Syphilis test
        1. InnoLIA-Syphilis test positive:  permanent deferral, refer to Infectious Disease clinic
        2. If InnoLIA-Syphilis borderline or negative:  permanent deferral, syphilis not confirmed, Guidance for Industry, February 2020

References:

  1. Use of Serologic Tests to Reduce the Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Viruses Types I and II, Final Guidance for Industry, February 2020
  2. Draft Guidance for Industry:  Recommendations for Requalification of Blood Donors Deferred Because of Reactive Test Results for Antibodies to Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Types I and II (anti-HTLV-I/II), CBER, September 2018
  3. Guidance for Industry:  Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV): Testing, Product Disposition, and Donor Deferral and Reentry, US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research CBER, May 2010
  4. Guidance for Industry:  Requalification Method for Reentry of Blood Donors Deferred Because of Reactive Test Results for Antibody to Hepatitis B Core Antigen (Anti-HBc), US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research CBER, May 2010
  5. Product inserts, InnoLIA-Syphilis/HCV/HIV/HTLV

Now An Independent Consultant

I am an independent consultant in Transfusion Medicine. Effective 16 April 2020, I am no longer associated with Hamad Medical Corporation or the State of Qatar.

I am willing to consider other opportunities in Transfusion Medicine (donor, patient, apheresis) and blood bank informatics.

Just before leaving HMC, I established the COVID19 convalescent plasma program with full good manufacturing practices using Medinfo Hematos IIG blood bank software.

I have 10 year’s experience in pathogen inactivation and blood component automated production. I established the first site using Terumo Atreus (later Reveos) with Mirasol pathogen inactivation AND platelet additive solution. I established Medinfo interfaces with all production equipment to achieve GMP.

I have worked with laboratory information systems, especially but not limited to blood bank systems (donor, component processing, donor marker testing, pathogen inactivation, platelet additive solutions) and serve as the Head of the Medinfo IIG (Nice, France) Software Users Group.

I was involved with planning for the national plasma fractionation project in Saudi Arabia. I have worked with this industry while I was practicing in the United States.

It is my philosophy to start with an international framework (e.g.FDA, CE) and localize it for the country’s particular needs. My operation sites have served as international reference sites for combined IT and medical/technical processes.