Tag: Donor Apheresis

Collection of plasma, platelets, RBCs, or combinations of them using apheresis equipment

Blood Bank Software is Dynamic, NOT Static

drzeyd

I was recently talking with one of the hospital software system administrators from my previous site.  He had originally worked on building the Medinfo system, but was then reassigned to the laboratory modules of the hospital information system.

His alarming comment to me was that the Medinfo build was completed so there was no need to worry about it now—it was finished.  I guess he was looking from the perspective of the general laboratory software.  There is no need to make major changes to the build, just update interfaces and troubleshoot.

I was surprised.  He had no idea of how many times we have to update the structure for new rules and regulations, and changes in blood bank practice—let alone emerging pathogens such as ZIKA, dengue, Chikungunya, and most recently, COVID-19.

My daily morning routine was to survey several blood bank websites with changes to blood donor criteria including US FDA CBER, read the transfusion journals (Transfusion, Vox Sanguis, etc.), AABB, and ASFA.  If there were any changes pertinent to our organization, I had to make interim policies and procedures, and finally prepare specifications for changes in the Medinfo software.

The Medinfo engineers would prepare flow charts of the proposed changes and implement them in a test environment for the Super-Users to test.  I had to prepare validation protocols for the testing, and then review the validation results and finally approve the adoption of the changes.

I cannot remember even a month going by without some revision in the donor protocols.  When COVID-19 came, I had to prepare a parallel, but separate, processing and allocation/release system.

This was a never-ending story that kept the Super Users and the local Medinfo engineers busy.  I always reminded the hospital information system staff that playing with blood bank software was like playing with fire:  there is a good chance you will get burned if you do not set it up properly.

31/10/20

Policy: ISBT Specimen Labelling Audit

drzeyd

Principle:

ISBT specimen labels have a check-digit to reduce the risk of misreading the label.  They are generated by the blood bank computer system Medinfo.  Normally one group of labels is printed for all needs (donor unit, marker testing, donor immunohematology, and donor processing.  Reprinting the same number is restricted to minimize the risk of using the wrong label on a specimen or unit.  These labels are NOT used for patient testing.

ISBT specimen labels are only printed at the time of donor registration.  We must securitize them so that they are not used for other, potentially malicious purposes.  Remember:  a labelling mistake may cause fatality in a patient receiving the wrong blood component.

Policy:

  1. ISBT specimen labels are only for blood donor specimens, initially labelling of donor collections, and intermediate processing of components.
  2. They must be applied to the primary specimens directly at the donor’s bedside.
  3. They must be applied to aliquots from the original ISBT-labelled tubes.
  4. They may NOT be applied to any other specimen (e.g. for routine laboratory testing outside Transfusion Medicine)
    1. If an ISBT label not corresponding to the correct donor is discovered, an OVA or event report must be generated and investigated immediately.
  5. If additional ISBT labels are needed, this must be documented on a specific audit sheet with signature of the person taking the extra labels and a second person to witness their removal.  It will also be noted in the Medinfo system for auditing purposes.
  6. The audit sheet must be kept in a secure place for future reference in Blood Donor Center.

14/10/20

Donor Center Materials and Equipment Strategy

drzeyd

This is the policy I developed for HMC Doha Blood Donor Center:

Policy:

  1. This policy applies to all blood donor processing (including reagents, materials, equipment) in the Blood Donor Center.
    1. Immunohematology testing and donor infectious disease marker testing are not included.
  2. Equipment and reagents must be selected to meet/exceed productions standards set by the Council of Europe, International AABB, HMC policies and procedures, and Qatari law.
  3. Each equipment must have a fully functioning, reliable, bidirectional interface to Medinfo Hematos IIG and be fully interfaced
    1. Vendor is responsible to pay for the interface licensing for each piece of equipment.
  4. Materials/reagents/equipment must cover the following functionalities:
    1. Automated separation of whole blood and apheresis components into:
      1. Packed RBCs in additive solution
      2. Buffy coat derived platelet pools
      3. Apheresis-derived platelets, plasma, and/or RBCs
      4. Fresh frozen and FP24 plasma
    2. Pathogen inactivation of whole blood, platelets, plasma, RBCs
    3. Cryoprecipitate
    4. Cryo-poor plasma
    5. Frozen RBCs (high-glycerol method)
    6. Washed RBCs
    7. Thawed plasma
    8. Irradiated RBCs
    9. Reconstituted whole blood (PRBCs and thawed plasma)
    10. Leukodepletion of ALL components to current and future CE standards
  5. Equipment must have/meet:
    1. CE mark or equivalent (FDA, CSA, etc.)
    2. Sufficient throughput for the workload in the area assigned
    3. Scalability:  A path of upgrading to larger capacity/throughput equipment using the same reagent line of the vendor
    4. A minimum of two of each equipment type must be obtained to minimize disruption of blood supply.
  6. Vendors:
    1. Vendors must offer 24/7 service on critical equipment for donor blood component and patient compatibility testing
    2. Vendors who do not meet qualification standards must not be used.

References:

  1. Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, Current Edition, AABB, Bethesda, MD, USA
  2. Guide to the Preparation, Use, and Quality Assurance of Blood Components, European Committee (Partial Agreement) on Blood Transfusion (CD-P-TS), European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Healthcare, Current Edition, Strasbourg, France

Donor Deferrals for Body Fluid Exposure

drzeyd

Principle:

New rules have been approved by US FDA CBER for body fluid exposure, tattooing, body fluid exposure, and body-piercing.  By similar logic we will extend this also to HIJAMA.  We will not make any changes to our sexual history/practices or history of sexually transmitted disease treatment.

Policy:

  1. Effective immediately, we will accept donors AFTER THREE MONTHS from the following activities:
    1. HIJAMA (ritual blood-letting)
    2. Tattooing
    3. Body piercing (e.g. piercing for ear-rings)
    4. Contact with blood of another individual through percutaneous inoculation such as a needle stick or through contact with a donor’s open wound or mucous membranes
  2. A TWELVE-MONTH DEFERRAL still applies after receiving a blood component or blood derivative except clotting factors.
  3. Transfusion of clotting factors remains a permanent/indefinite deferral.

Reference:

Revised Recommendations for Reducing the Risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission by Blood and Blood Products, Guidance for Industry,  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, April 2020

Review of Product Inserts

drzeyd

This is a policy I made for NGHA Jeddah many years ago but is still useful today.

Principle:

All technical staff are required to read and understand the manufacturer package inserts that apply to the procedures that they perform.  This policy establishes a means of documenting compliance with this requirement.

Policy Details:

  1. Technical staff are defined as anyone who uses the reagent in the performance of a procedure or process or anyone reviews or supervises that process or procedure.  This includes the supervisor, medical technologists, medical technicians, nurses, phlebotomists, and assistants.
  2. All technical staff are required to read and understand ALL product inserts for each procedure applicable to the section(s) that they work in—apheresis, donor room, component preparation, and/or transfusion service.
  3. If they have any questions about a particular insert, they should refer it to the supervisor, senior technologist (Med Tech 1), or in the latter’s absence, the blood bank medical director/section head.
  4. Each staff member must sign the Manufacturer’s Package Insert Review Form for that particular policy/procedure, including his signature, employee identification number, and date.
  5. Each Manufacturer’s Package Insert Review Form will be retained with a copy of the package insert by the Blood Bank Supervisor in a special file while the material is being used and for at least five (5) years after a new or revised manufacturer package insert is applicable.
  6. A new Manufacturer’s Package Insert Review Form should be used for each revision of the insert.

Insert Review Form

Type of Insert:  New  Revised
Product Name:
Date of Insert:

I have read this insert and understand its contents and accept responsibility for following its instructions and directions.

Staff Name & Badge #–PRINT!SignatureDate
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Sample Resident Examination for Donor Center

drzeyd

Reading Assignments:

  • Chapters 5-9:  Blood Donation and Collection in Technical Manual, 16th Edition
  • Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, AABB, 25th Edition

Study Questions:

  1. Which of the following candidates is acceptable for donation?
    1. Saudi, visited Sudan 11 months ago as part of National Guard exchange
    2. Saudi former student lived in UK for 2 years from 1993-95
    3. Normotensive taking amlodipine and valsartan
    4. Psoriatic using Tegison
    5. Male adult using ibuprofen for lower back pain
    6. Female 4 weeks post-partum
    7. Husband of patient with recent onset of hepatitis B infection
    8. Male stopped taking ampicillin one week ago for acute pharyngitis
    9. Donor with WBC count 12000/cmm but otherwise normal
  2. Which of the following donors is suitable for autologous donation?
    1. Cataract surgery patient
    2. Well, but had gastroenteritis 3 days ago
    3. Pregnant with Hgb 11 g/dl
    4. CGL patient with Hgb 13 g/dl
    5. Hodgkin’s disease patient Hgb 12 for exploratory laparotomy
    6. Patient with rare antibody anti-Tja, Hgb 13 for cholecystecomy
  3. How do you handle the following events?
    1. Donor draw fills bag with bright red blood in 30 seconds
    2. Donor faints when needle is shown
    3. Lipemic serum during donor plateletpheresis session
    4. Donor with numbness and tingling of extremities during donor apheresis session
  4. How would you handle the following therapeutic phlebotomy requests?
    1. Hgb 22 g/dl, suspected polycythemia rubra vera
    2. Hgb 13, suspected hemochromatosis patient
    3. Hgb 16, renal failure patient post-erythropoietin treatment
    4. Unstable angina, Hgb 9
  5. What is the final volume of each of the following blood components?
    1. Whole blood
    2. Packed RBCs—state hematocrit as well
    3. Washed RBCs
    4. Irradiated packed cells
    5. Platelet pool—state number of platelets
    6. FFP
    7. Cryo-poor plasma
    8. Cryoprecipitate
  6. What are the outdates of each of the following components?
    1. Packed RBCs
    2. Platelet pool
    3. FFP frozen at -35C
    4. Granulocyte concentrate
  7. Which donor units are acceptable for transfusion?
    1. HBsAg negative, HBcAb positive, HBsAb > 20 IU/liter
    2. HCV Ab positive, RIBA-3 negative, HCV-RNA negative
    3. Syphilis positive, FTA-ABS negative

Revised:

29/8/20

Advanced Hematology Resident Training in Donor Center and Apheresis

drzeyd

Objectives:

  1. Donor criteria based on AABB standards
    1. Is it safe for the donor to donate?
    2. Medical history
      1. Current medical conditions
      2. Past medical conditions
  2. Medications
  3. Vaccinations
  4. Travel history
  5. High-risk behaviors
  6. SARS/MERS
  7. COVID-19 convalescent plasma CCP
  8. Prion diseases
  9. Donor medical examination
  10. Is it safe for the recipient to receive the donor’s blood?
  11. Donor registration issues
    1. Positive identification
    2. Donor deferral database
  12. Donor phlebotomy
    1. Safe volume to donate
    2. Anticoagulant-preservative solutions
    3. Time limit for phlebotomy
    4. Post-donation care
  13. Donor reactions—Dx and Rx of the following:
    1. Vasovagal
    2. Seizures
    3. Air embolism
    4. Arterial stick
    5. Hematoma
  14. Donor Apheresis
    1. Plateletpheresis
    2. Plasmapheresis
    3. Plateletpheresis with concurrent plasma collection
    4. RBC collection
    5. Combined platelet, plasma, and RBC collection
  15. Autologous donation
    1. Predeposit
    2. Perioperative
    3. Intraoperative
    4. Postoperative
  16. Donor self-deferral
  17. Therapeutic Phlebotomy
  18. Therapeutic Apheresis
    1. Therapeutic plasma exchange/plasmapheresis
    2. Leukapheresis
    3. Thrombapheresis
    4. Red cell exchange
    5. Stem cell collection
    6. Column absorption technologies
    7. Clinical indications
    8. Writing orders for above procedures
  19. Component Processing:
    1. Manual
    2. Automated—Reveos
    3. Pathogen Inactivation Mirasol
    4. Buffy coat vs classic platelet-rich plasma platelets and pools
    5. Platelet Additive Solution PAS
    6. FFP, FP24, thawed plasma
    7. Cryoprecipitate
    8. Cryo-poor plasma (plasma, cryoprecipitate-removed)
    9. COVID-19 convalescent plasma CCP

Clinical Responsibilities (after proven competence):

  1. Triage of donor requests
  2. Handling of donor reactions
  3. Approval of therapeutic phlebotomies
  4. Assistance with therapeutic apheresis

Assessments:

  1. Pre-training/baseline
  2. Competency documentation for clinical responsibilities (#11 above)
  3. Post-training

Working Hours:

  1. 0900-1700, Saturday through Wednesday
  2. Must carry pager for clinical responsibilities

Reviewed 17/8/20

Basic Hematology Fellowship Rotation in Transfusion Medicine

drzeyd

Objectives:

  1. Donor Center
    1. Donor eligibility criteria
    2. Whole blood collection
    3. Donor apheresis (platelets, plasma, dual-RBC)
    4. Donor reactions
  2. Therapeutic Apheresis
    1. Plasma exchange
    2. Leukocyte reduction—stem cell collection
    3. Reductive thrombapheresis
    4. RBC exchange
    5. Column-absorption procedures including phototherapy
  3. Component Preparation
    1. Preparation and release issues
  4. Transfusion Service:
    1. Blood component therapy
    2. RBC blood groups
    3. Compatibility Testing
    4. Antibody Identification and clinical significance
    5. Transfusion reactions
    6. Direct antiglobulin test clinical significance
    7. Drug-related hemolysis

Venue:

TMS Donor and Transfusion Services

Conducted by:  Head, TMS, and senior TMS technical staff

Evaluation:

Discussion of topics with TMS Head and written final examination

Source Materials:

  1. Technical Manual, AABB
  2. Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, AABB
  3. Apheresis, Principles and Practice, AABB

This is a full-time, one-month rotation—attendance in mandatory.  Vacations should NOT be taken during this rotation.

Originally Prepared for NGHA Riyadh 31/3/09

Reviewed 26/8/20

My Opinion: Separate Transfusion Medicine from the Laboratory

drzeyd

Transfusion Medicine includes laboratory and non-laboratory functions.  The non-laboratory and purely clinical functions are unique and have no analogy within the general laboratory.

The transfusion service/hospital blood bank laboratory is the closest to a laboratory operation, but there is component modification and complex manual testing, especially for reference immunohematology testing.  The staff must make detailed manual decisions, the errors for which could be life-threatening for the patient.

The blood donor center manufactures a pharmaceutical, i.e. blood components with collection, donor qualification, donor abnormal results review, infectious disease marker testing, component production, and donor immunohematology testing—all subject to Good Manufacturing Practices.  Never forget:  Blood is a drug!!

No other laboratory section is directly responsible for treatment of critically ill patients.  Therapeutic apheresis is essential for organ and stem-cell transplants, nephrology, neurology, etc.  No other laboratory section is directly responsible for treatment of critically ill patients.  Transfusion Medicine physicians are functioning as intensivists.  There is no hiding in the laboratory from clinical medicine.

There may also be an industrial manufacturing plant to extract various blood derivatives (e.g. factor concentrates, albumin, Rh immune globulin, etc.)  This is pharmaceutical manufacturing on a large-scale basis.  There is medical, technical, and special administrative expertise.

Many functions may operate 24/7.  The transfusion medicine physician may be on-call for donor issues and review of complex immunohematology problems to acutely decide which blood component (and phenotype) should be given as well as review all adverse reactions to transfusion.

The unique blend of clinical skills is unlike anything else in the laboratory.  Also, those outside the blood bank rarely have the skills or judgments for the best course of action for transfusion medicine or for its operations.

The clinical transfusion medicine physician must make acute, life-threatening decisions unlike anyone else in the laboratory.  The blood bank technologist is at the cutting edge of the battle with his testing and interpretations.  No other area of the laboratory is at such risk for injuring or even killing the patient.  There is high stress and burn-out.

I have talked with many blood bankers and many seem to share the exasperation that the laboratory does not understand us.  The latter looks at blood bank testing like that coming off a hematology or chemistry analyzer—although patients rarely would have severe morbidity or mortality like the blood bank from errors in those analyzers.

No laboratory pathologist has the pressure of the blood bank physician on-call.  It really is 24/7 and requires a broad, clinical background to make the right decisions.  It is very stressful and does not permit a good night’s sleep.

Thus, I make my case to separate us from the laboratory.  We can form our own more effective administrative organization and optimize our own planning.  Regretfully, I have never worked in such an administrative structure.  I also am a realist that cost-containment nowadays makes it much less likely high administration would permit this change for a mere cost center.  This will probably never happen during my career.

Finally, Transfusion Medicine is an essential service.  Blood components are essential drugs.  The operations and staff must be free of political influences.  This is a service for the entire region or country like the fire department, civil defense, etc.

8/8/20