This is an updated version of a presentation given to the Saudi MOH several years ago. I have included statements about pathogen inactivation and platelet additive solution which were not used on the original date.





















This is an updated version of a presentation given to the Saudi MOH several years ago. I have included statements about pathogen inactivation and platelet additive solution which were not used on the original date.





















As I designed this in Medinfo, this is algorithm uses an HIV- /HIV-2 antibody EIA screening test, HIV p24 antigen test, and a confirmatory linear immunoblot assay LIA that can discriminate between type HIV-1 and type HIV-2. If there is an indeterminate result, a repeat test is ordered after 8 weeks. A reentry protocol is also included (1.6.3 below).
This algorithm is represented in Medinfo as follows:

To Be Continued:
17/8/20
HMC Doha 2011-2020: Set-up of both donor and patient modules including inter-depot transfer:
Donor:
Implemented COVID-19 convalescent plasma CCP production at HMC Doha over two-week period, February-March, 2020 including full integration with software
Donor collection, donor marker testing, donor immunohematology testing, inter-depot transfer between production site and hospitals and hospital-hospital transfers, ISBT labelling and specimen
Collection Interface (read-only) with Qatar Ministry of Interior to obtain both English and Arabic demographic information from donors
Establishing world’s first interfaces (bidirectional as required) with Terumo BCT Atreus and Reveos automated blood processing equipment, Mirasol pathogen-inactivation/platelet additive solution, Terumo Trima Accel donor apheresis machine, Terumo mixer-shaker donor collection device
Patient:
Implemented a CCP quarantine patient blood bank separate from regular hospital blood banks) for thawing and releasing of CCP plasma
Patient module including all compatibility testing, ABO/D typing, extended antigen typings, direct and indirect antiglobulin testing (antibody screens), antibody identifications, eluate, component modifications (thawing, pooling, aliquoting), interfacing of Diamed automated gel testing
Establishing algorithms for emergency release, electronic crossmatching, automated patient specimen titration with Ortho Vision MAX, prophylactic antigen matching, ensuring irradiation of blood components or use of pathogen-inactivation as required, allocation rules by algorithm, required and optional antigen matching in presence of antibodies
Development of bidirectional interface between Medinfo patient module and Cerner Millennium laboratory module (permitting order of transfusion tests and blood component orders in Cerner, transmission to Medinfo patient module for testing and allocation of components, and then sending test results and component status back to Cerner)
Common:
Developing current and future states to develop the workflows to prepare software processes
Validation testing, initial/user acceptance testing, follow-up validations
NGHA Riyadh 2009-2010: Set up of both donor and patient modules including inter-depot transfer:
Donor:
Collection, marker testing, immunohematology testing, component production, inter-depot transfer between production site and hospitals and hospital-hospital transfers, ISBT labelling and specimens
Patient:
Patient module including all compatibility testing, ABO/D typing, extended antigen typings, direct and indirect antiglobulin testing (antibody screens), antibody identifications, eluate, component modifications (thawing, pooling, aliquoting), interfacing of Diamed automated gel testing
Please refer to my website https://drzeydbloodbank.com for specific posts on Medinfo software process building. On the right hand side from the bottom TAGS menu, pick Medinfo Hematos IIG to see those articles.

This is the third part of this Saudi Ministry of Health presentation that I gave several years ago and looks at TRALI/TACO pathophysiology.














To Be Continued
13/8/20
As I designed in Medinfo, this is a much simpler algorithm than HCV and uses an HTLV-1/HTLV-2 screening test and a confirmatory linear immunoblot assay LIA that can discriminate between type 1 and type 2. If there is an indeterminate result, a repeat test is ordered after 6 months:
This is translated into the following Medinfo processes:

To Be Continued:
15/8/20
Second part of fatal adverse effects due to transfusion: this was originally presented at the Saudi MOH several years ago:










To Be Continued:
12/8/20
The following protocol is the one I made for National Guard Health Affairs in Riyadh and has been updated to include the use of a blood bank computer system.
Medinfo has an emergency mode that facilitates release of blood components even if all the usual testing is not available
If Medinfo software is used, one can write a protocol based on the diagnosis of placenta previa to automatically allocate the blood and keep it on hold at all times.
Ward Responsibilities:
Blood Bank Responsibilities:
The testing algorithms may trigger additional testing, repeat of current testing at some future date, or permanent deferral. One of the most complex processes is for HCV testing. The following criteria are based on US FDA CBER guidelines, but are modified for the availability of test methodologies not licensed in the USA.
For HCV, we use the following testing in all donors:
HCV LIA is more sensitive than RIBA-3 (now no longer performed in the USA) but is not available in the USA. This test has been incorporated into the testing algorithm from CBER:
Note that indeterminate HCV results may be carried forward repeatedly by CBER rules but I decided to permanently defer the donor after 2 cycles of indeterminate results. The donor must wait SIX MONTHS before the next round of testing. Should he/she return before that time, those results may not be used for determining donor eligibility (unless the results have become clearly positive).

To Be Continued:
10/8/20
This is a presentation I made at the Saudi MOH many years ago, but it is still good for teaching purposes. I am dividing it into multiple parts because of its size.












To Be Continued:
11/8/20
Donor marker testing algorithms are very complex and serve multiple objectives:
Often the donor disposition is unclear based on a single encounter and a temporary deferral must be triggered so the current results may be compared to future ones, usually after 8 weeks, 6 months, or one year—depending on the pathogen in question.
Regretfully, the significance of reactions that do not meet the criteria for positivity may be unclear. It is very difficult to explain to the donor that he has abnormal results and cannot donate but we as physicians do not know what their significance is.
Thus, the testing algorithms may trigger current additional testing, temporary deferral with repeat of testing at some future date, or permanent deferral.
At my previous positions, I started with the AABB/FDA CBER Uniform Donor Questionnaire UDQ and then modified it to include some advanced methodologies not available in the USA.
In the next series of posts I will elaborate on the processes developed for this for each marker.
To Be Continued
9/8/20