

Recruitment and Collection


Principle:
This is an updated set of donor deferral rules based on US FDA CBER guidances for body fluid exposures, blood components, and exposure to COVID-19 convalescent plasma CCP.
Policy:
References:
The COVID-19 pandemic imposed new challenges to our system. In general, these could be divided into:
There were fewer donors in the early phase and the nurses also had to add a large number of donor plasmapheresis collections for COVID convalescent plasma CCP. Still they had to maintain all donor and therapeutic apheresis services with no increase in staff. Although elective procedures had been cancelled, there were still obstetrical, oncologic, and trauma services in full action.
Many of our staff were on leave when the borders were closed. Some had to wait months before they could return to work. Others had COVID-19 infection and were quarantined for several weeks. This further reduced staffing. We could not just hire outside staff since considerable training is involved in these processes.
I dedicated a separate donor collection space for the CCP program away from the regular donors as well as a quarantine processing area. Similarly, the CCP plasma was kept segregated from the regular plasma supply and a specially designed location was identified for release of this product. Working for this program diverted resources from blood collection to this special project, again without increasing resources.
With disruptions to shipments of supplies, including the Reveos whole blood kits and Trima donor apheresis sets, we had to rely on our large in-home inventory until the situation stabilized. We prescreened the CCP donor candidates before we would collect them to avoid wastage of kits.
Fortunately, our throughput was minimally affected because our equipment and processes had always stressed speed. We used single-well NAT testing to minimize the need of additional runs. Also, we used Reveos automated component processing to greatly speed production (one Reveos can process four whole blood units in about 23 minutes or about 12 units in 75 minutes.) One technologist could operate all 4 of our machines simultaneously and perform other tasks while the machines were working.
In the system I developed in Qatar, we could complete processing into components (RBCs, buffy coat platelet pools, leukodepleted plasma), all marker and immunohematology testing, leukoreduction of the pools and RBCs, Mirasol pathogen inactivation, and platelet additive solution in as little as five hours.
In rapid turn-around events, it is most helpful to have a robust blood bank computer system that can scale to the challenge. Also, it must mercilessly enforce all the rules starting with donor qualification, screening, collection through testing and production. At times of emergency, it is difficult to meet Good Manufacturing Processes manually.
I had built parallel separate donor collection, donor processing, and transfusion service/hospital blood bank processes specifically for CCP and had to staff them with available personnel, limited our capability to process regular donors. The blood bank computer software restricted CCP use to designated physicians and transfusing locations. For those interested, there is a separate series of posts about the CCP project and its implementation in the dedicated blood bank Medinfo HIIG.
COVID-19 vaccinations should have minimal effect in donor qualification since mRNA or antigen-based ones do not cause donor deferral. Live attenuated COVID vaccines will defer donors for 2 weeks by current rules—the same as other live vaccines. Donors who had previously received CCP will be deferred for three (3) months after last receiving this product.
In summary, the COVID pandemic reduced staffing and affected donor recruitment. We had production mitigations to maximize throughput. The system was stressed by the reduced staffing and special demands to produce CCP. However, the extent of our automation allowed us to maintain throughput throughout the crisis.


Principle:
This policy is based on the 19/1/21 CBER document Updated Information for Blood Establishments Regarding COVID-19 Pandemic and Blood Donation.
Policy:
Note that these rules do not address the special case of COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors.
References:
Updated Information for Blood Establishments Regarding the COVID-19 Pandemic and Blood Transfusion, CBER, US FDA, 19/1/21
This post is the policy for using comments in Medinfo software. A subsequent post will show the process of entering comments.
Principle:
There are several different types of comments in HIIG:
Global Comments appear on the first main screen of either the donor or patient record. The presence of comments is indicated by a bar at the bottom of the screen (in yellow or blue saying Presence of Comments. Double-clicking opens the list of entered comments.
Examination/Results Comments appear only when you open the result to which it is attached. You must know in advance to which result they are linked to find them.
Contraindication Comments appear when entering a donor deferral code
At HMC, we will enter examination/results comments again as global comments (donor or patient) so it is easy for staff to retrieve them and see them with all other comments. You can do this by cut and paste.
Physicians may enter any of these comment types. Comments may be entered before or after a test is authorized/verified. If entered after authorization, the test must be modified to accept the comment and require a special password (not the user sign-into HIIG). Only results/examination comments are visible in the patient’s medical record. Global, analysis, and contraindication comments are visible only in HIIG! Donor comments are only visible in HIIG.
The presence of comments documents physician review of abnormal results as required by the various accreditation standards.
Policy:
References:







Principle:
Therapeutic phlebotomy is a medical procedure that requires a written physician’s order and review/approval by a transfusion medicine physician. Transfusion Medicine is responsible for the procedure and makes the final decision of the conditions of the procedure (volume of whole blood and venue).
Policy:
References:
Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, Current Edition, AABB, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Annual Review: Therapeutic Phlebotomy Criteria and Treatment Goals
This a revised version of a previous post for the processes of autologous transfusion that I developed at HMC Doha. It can serve as a template for other sites and was also a teaching document for the Transfusion Committee members.
Background:
There are four basic types of autologous transfusion: preoperative, perioperative hemodilution, intraoperative, and postoperative drainage/collection. The use of all of the above techniques can significantly decrease the need for homologous blood and as an added benefit reduce the risk of the disease transmission and immunosuppressive effects of such homologous transfusions.
Preoperative collection can make available packed red blood cells, whole blood, platelets, FFP, and/or cryoprecipitate. However, at most two units of blood per week can be collected. RBC’s can be stored for up to 42 days in the liquid state, frozen RBC’s up to ten years, platelets up to five days, and fresh frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate up to one year. The last collection cannot be less than 72 hours prior to the surgery time. Units can be collected as long as the patient’s hematocrit remains above 33%. Supplemental iron and erythropoietin can increase the number of units harvested. The biggest obstacle to using this service is the coordination of the patient scheduling for this procedure. The blood bank does not have the resources to prospectively analyze the surgical scheduling and make the various appointments, contact the attending physician, etc. Thus, this service is vastly underutilized.
PHD or Perioperative hemodilution (also called acute normovolemic hemodilution) is useful in cases when the anticipated blood loss is at least one liter and the initial hematocrit is at least 34%. This includes essentially all types of surgery, but in particular cardiac, vascular, orthopedic, and urologic cases. The patient’s hematocrit Hct. is lowered to the range of 20-25% and the blood is replaced by crystalloid in a ratio of 3:1–i.e. three times as much fluid as blood, or in the case of colloid replacement, a 1:1 ratio of colloid plus 0.5 to 1.0 ml. of crystalloid. Crystalloid has the advantage of being readily removed by diuretic use. However, this technique should not be undertaken when vascular access is inadequate or appropriate monitoring devices are lacking. The physician performing PHD must be familiar with the compensatory mechanisms normally invoked when the hemoglobin is acutely lowered.
Another new twist to PHD is the perioperative collection of platelets by a special attachment to a cell-saving machine. This could allow collection of a typical apheresis load, about 6 to 10 units of fresh platelets for potential use. There are currently studies underway to determine if this has particular clinical advantages to warrant the additional cost.
Intraoperative salvage may be performed with a number of canister or automated devices. The latter is usually used when there are large volumes (usually 3 or more units) of blood to be salvaged. Depending on the body site, the recovered material is at least filtered and may or may not be washed. Care must be taken to collect the blood at a low suction rate and with minimal turbulence to minimize hemolysis.
Postoperative drainage collection of certain sites such as post-knee replacement surgery or chest wounds involves a canister collection device. This blood may or may not be filtered before reinfusion.
Note that perioperative and intraoperative material can only be transfused up to six or eight hours at room temperature or 24 hours if refrigerated at 1-6 degrees (depending on the method used) post collection to minimize the risk of infection. Intraoperative collection may be contraindicated in cases of cancer and if the bowel has been violated.
Other Issues:
The transfusion criteria for autologous blood is the same as for allogeneic units.
The same compatibility testing algorithm applies both the autologous and allogeneic units.
Policy:
References: