Tag: Immunohematology

Immunohematology testing and processes

The Devil is in the Details: Three Antibody Panels for Illustration

drzeyd

As a Transfusion Medicine physician, I reviewed all antibody workups.  Here are three different panels, all appearing to be panreactive,  at AHG phase.  Note the differences:

  1. Autocontrol is positive, enzyme is panreactive and enhanced
  2. Autocontrol is negative, enzyme phase shows no reactions
  3. Autocontrol is negative, enzyme phase is panreactive enhanced

In the middle of the night, if I am called to select blood, I always keep these patterns first and foremost in my mind.

Case 1:

If the autocontrol is positive at about the same strength as the panreactivity.  I can state that this is probably a warm autoimmune pattern WAIHA (although I cannot rule out underlying clinically significant alloantibodies obscured by this pattern and need to do autologous auto-absorption ZZAP).  Both warm autoimmune antibodies and certain drug reactions may cause this pattern.  Use least-incompatible crossmatch matching any significant specificities you found by ZZAP and observe the patient closely throughout transfusion.

Case 2:

If the autocontrol is negative and all reactions are enzyme-labile—and if you live in the Middle East/Gulf region, then you have a presumptive anti-Ge2.  You can safely ignore this antibody and release least-incompatible crossmatch RBCs, regardless of the strength of the reactions.

Case 3:

If the autocontrol is negative and the reactions are unchanged or enhanced by enzyme, BE AFRAID, VERY AFRAID!!  This is an antibody to a high-incidence antigen.  These can be very dangerous.  In the Middle East/Gulf region, consider anti-H, anti-k (cellano), anti-Kpb, anti-PP1Pk, and rare antibodies to the MNSs such as anti-U or other MN system deletions.  There are many other possibilities, e.g. anti-Fy3.

You need to perform extended antigen typing across the major Rh antigen, Kell, Duffy, Kidd, MNSs, P systems (at least P1):

  1. Run H lectin to rule out Bombay Oh or Parabombay.
  2. Some Rh system deletions and Rh null show pan-Rh reactivity—check D, C, c, E, e typings.
  3. Anti-k (cellano) will be suggested by k-negative phenotype.
  4. Unusual, weak or absent reactions with M and N reagents suggest something like En(a)-negative or similar.
  5. Absent P1 with no other findings, you must rule out anti-Tja (anti-PP1Pk).

I have seen all of these specificities during my time in the Middle East.  All of these antibodies can be clinically significant and often life-threatening.

Conclusion:  NEVER NEGLECT TO REVIEW THE AUTOCONTROL!!!

Nonspecific Reactions, Reagents Near Expiration

drzeyd

Whenever I had a “nonspecific” antibody, I had to first rule out issues with the reagents themselves. The following example shows weak to 2+ reactions in the panel cells and autocontrol.

The variability in the reactions made me initially uncomfortable about called this WAIHA. I then checked the panel details: the testing was done only six days before the panel outdate.

I told my staff to repeat the workup with the new panel expiring five weeks later. The difference is astounding!!

Remember: if you work in the Middle East, the environmental conditions can be extreme in summer (>50C). Do you know how your reagents were handling during transport?

My advice: if you are concerned there is a clinically significant antibody but cannot discern it, consider repeating the workup using fresh reagents.

Processes and Software Building 7: Interfaces 2

drzeyd

Blood Bank instruments may perform tests and release test results in a numerical or alphanumeric format or both.  For example, nucleic acid and enzyme immunoassay may release a qualitative result (e.g. positive, reactive, borderline/grayzone, negative, nonreactive).  Alternatively, the machine may release the signal to cutoff ratio (S/CO) as a numeric result.

Blood bank software may use either kind of result on which to base interpretative rules for acceptability of the donor.  The qualitative result criteria are based on the quantitative SC/O but the equipment automatically interprets this.  The S/CO ratio of 1 is the cut-off point.  Thus a value of 0.99 is negative and the value 1.01 is positive.  But is it really so clear-cut since the difference between the two is so small?  Thus, some people have added the term grayzone for values close to but below the cutoff.  Could a value of 0.95 be an early infection?

I personally prefer to see the actual cutoff but use the manufacturer’s criteria for interpretation.  As a physician, it is good to review the S/CO on serial exams.  If a borderline or grayzone result becomes positive, then perhaps the original result indicated early infection.  The question still remains, what is the grayzone?  0.95 to 0.99, 0.90 to 0.99, etc.  Some accrediting schema have not used grayzone for interpretation.

With Medinfo’s blood bank software, I could chose either option or both—or at least store the S/CO as a nonreported result for subsequent review.  I could even chose, test by test, in a series between reporting either S/CO or the qualitative result.

Semiquantitative results, e.g. in {0, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+} are qualitative and could also include mixed field (mf) and hemolyzed (h).  I showed examples of this with ABO/D antigen typing in a previous post—see attachment.

On the contrary, the results from blood production equipment may include parameters such as time of preparation, original volume, final volumes for each component, platelet yield index as an indirect measure of platelet count.  When there is pooling, the final total volume is critical to determine if pathogen-inactivation procedures and platelet additive solution can be used.  This is a much more complicated interface.

The blood production equipment interface issues will be considered in a future post.

Attachment:

ABO/D sample typing process in Medinfo

To Be Continued:

24/6/20

Case Report: Unusual Antibody Anti-Jka

drzeyd

This is a rare anti-Jka that only reacts with polyspecific AHG and only in Jka+ homozygous reagent cells. In the past three decades in the Middle East, I have only seen three of these.

Almost all anti-Jka and anti-Jkb antibodies in my experience can be detected using monospecific, gamma-heavy-chain AHG reagents (I personally prefer this latter reagent to avoid cold antibody interference.)

If you have a nonspecific antibody, never discount this possibility and then run polyspecific reagents and check for dosage. I also recommend extended antigen typing (e.g. Diamed/Biorad Profile Cards 1-2-3).

Inter-Depot Transfer: Further Thoughts

drzeyd

In my recent post, I provided sample flows and parameter mapping for delivery of blood components.  The final components from the component preparation center may be sent to various depots (freestanding location and/or hospital blood banks.  There should be complete traceability for every step (from donor reception, collection, testing, and processing) transport between locations, and finally the exact storage site, which might include which refrigerator/freezer/incubator and even shelf/position number for each component is stored.  The end of that document showed rules for type/antigen matching.

For disaster planning, rapid inventory enumeration by type is very important.  This can be very time-consuming manually.  With our Hematos blood bank system, we could quickly get total inventory across the Qatar or by hospital in less than one minute.  We could also quickly find antigen-matched units across the system and reserve it at any one site for another if necessary.

Smart blood bank dispensing refrigerators, as offered by Haemonetics and Angelatoni, may also serve as depots and take the place of a hospital blood bank for some dispensing.  These solutions can also capture vital information about the storage conditions of the components and prevent release if the storage criteria are not met.  They can also interface with blood bank computer systems and use the main system’s logic for the dispensation rules.

Upon receipt at the hospitals from the blood processing center, the forward ABO and D typing must be confirmed.  We used D reagents which detected partial D so that we would call such donor units as D-positive.  However, if a patient type reagent insensitive to partial D types were used, it is possible for a unit to be typed as D-negative whereas in the donor center it might be D-positive.  Sometimes, nothing types consistently as D-positive:  all you can say is that with a particular reagent and lot number, there is or isn’t reactivity.

The greatest complexity is for RBCs since potentially so many antigens exist.  Criteria for matching/ignoring certain antigens must be made.  Critically significant antibodies such as the Kell, Duffy, Kidd, and certain Rh (D and c) must be antigen matched.  A robust blood bank computer system can enforce these rules.

For other components, antigen/typing may be less important.  In fact, in most situations, any type of platelets can be given to anyone (except neonates).  Despite the potentially incompatible plasma, there is rarely significant hemolysis.  In fact, if pooling platelets without regard to blood types is done, a platelet transfusion is a common cause of a positive direct antiglobulin test DAT—something that is not clinically significant.  No one died of a positive DAT by itself for this reason.

Specific rules for compatible plasma types are important, but nowadays, low-titer group A plasma may be used like universal AB plasma.  The challenge is to be able to perform the ABO titration (specifically anti-B) quickly—titration can be a slow process, even with automated equipment.  A similar situation for low-titer, universal group O whole blood requires both anti-A and anti-B titration (I will return to this topic in a future post).

RBC Antigen Matching

drzeyd

In the previous post, the Medinfo document for Inter-Depot transfer had many pages of rules for matching RBC antigens.  Multiple actions were available:

  1. Forced Match, no release of untested or antigen-mismatch (e.g. anti-Kell requires specifically tested K-negative RBCs).
  2. Match Optional (e.g. anti-Lea/Leb does not require Lewis-matched blood):  system would flag a comment showing the antibody specificity, user would respond Y/N, and select units
  3. Least-Incompatible (e.g. WAIHA):  requires sufficient privilege (senior technical or transfusion physician) to authorize release
  4. Permitted Incompatible (e.g. give C-positive to patient with anti-C in times of shortage or complex multiple antibodies without fully matched blood available):  requires sufficient privilege to release
  5. Fully Allowed (e.g. group O RBCs to group A, AB, B patients)—no flagging, allocation of units permitted
  6. Prohibited Under Any Circumstance—NO Override Permitted (e.g. group O for Bombay Oh, c-positive for anti-c, K-positive for anti-K)

To avoid mistakes, the blood bank computer system enforced the rules.  There was no mercy.  Only specific individuals could override this( in many cases, but certain allocations (e.g. group O RBCs to a Bombay Oh patient) were not permitted under any circumstances.

Prophylactic Antigen Matching:

Please also refer to my prophylactic antigen matching post made last week for the rules I selected for Qatar.

Prophylactic antigen matching is common in Europe.  I have been doing this during the many years I have worked in the Middle East.  Most patients were not local nationals but transient.  They would return to their home countries where blood bank testing (antibody screening/identification/antigen matching) or intrauterine exchanges might not be always available.

For pregnant patients, we would prophylactically match K-negative and c-negative—regardless if there were antibodies detected—R1R1 units for R1R1 patients.  At the end of my time in Qatar, we had several pregnant women with various Rh deletions, so we added routine extended Rh(D) and Kell typing to all.

For sickle cell patients, especially African type, I would prophylactically match Rh antigens (D, C, c, E, e) and Kell because of the polymorphisms in the CE gene, some of which may lead to pan-Rh antibodies.

I would consider selective prophylactic antigen matching in chronically transfused populations, again regardless if clinically significant antibodies were detected.

If a patient makes any antibody, regardless if is clinically significant or not, I would consider that patient as a candidate for prophylactic antigen matching (but NOT necessarily for a clinically insignificant antibody).

In Qatar, blood bank services (testing and components) were not charged to the patient.  In many other parts of the world, blood bank is a cost center.  No prophylactic antigen matching may be routinely performed.  If it is done, it must be charged to the patient or the hospital must assume the cost.  I have gone to conferences in such locales where not even R1R1 patients were not matched and subsequently developed anti-c, which complicated management.  It would have been cheaper to do the antigen matching than to pay for the consequences of the alloimmunization.

Overview: Inter-Depot Transfer and Allocation of Blood Components

drzeyd

While I was working in Qatar, this was the overall process for transfer and allocation of blood components. Once they were finally labelled (only possible if all criteria had been meet), they were transferred from the Blood Donor Center BDC to Hamad General Hospital Blood Bank, from which they were distributed to all hospital blood banks in Qatar. Similarly, units could be transferred between the various hospital blood banks.

One could track components as being in:

  1. BDC
  2. Transit BDC to HGHBB
  3. HGHBB inventory
  4. Transit HGHBB to another hospital blood bank
  5. Transit between any two hospital blood banks

An inventory manifest would be printed to show all transferred units.

For patient use, allocation rules applied which would determine if an electronic or a full antiglobulin-phase crossmatch could be used and whether specific antigen-matched components were required.

There were also separate rules for emergency release if the standard criteria could not be met.

Now An Independent Consultant

drzeydLeave a comment

I am an independent consultant in Transfusion Medicine. Effective 16 April 2020, I am no longer associated with Hamad Medical Corporation or the State of Qatar.

I am willing to consider other opportunities in Transfusion Medicine (donor, patient, apheresis) and blood bank informatics.

Just before leaving HMC, I established the COVID19 convalescent plasma program with full good manufacturing practices using Medinfo Hematos IIG blood bank software.

I have 10 year’s experience in pathogen inactivation and blood component automated production. I established the first site using Terumo Atreus (later Reveos) with Mirasol pathogen inactivation AND platelet additive solution. I established Medinfo interfaces with all production equipment to achieve GMP.

I have worked with laboratory information systems, especially but not limited to blood bank systems (donor, component processing, donor marker testing, pathogen inactivation, platelet additive solutions) and serve as the Head of the Medinfo IIG (Nice, France) Software Users Group.

I was involved with planning for the national plasma fractionation project in Saudi Arabia. I have worked with this industry while I was practicing in the United States.

It is my philosophy to start with an international framework (e.g.FDA, CE) and localize it for the country’s particular needs. My operation sites have served as international reference sites for combined IT and medical/technical processes.