Tag: Donor Immunohematology

Donor ABO/D typing, antibody screening, antibody identification, ABO antibody titration

Processes and Software Building 48: Donor Immunohematology Testing

drzeyd

Donor immunohematology testing of components in progress is similar to patient immunohematology testing.  The tests include:

ABO forward and reverse testing

D typing by multiple monoclonal cocktails

ABO/D confirmatory testing

Antibody screening

Antibody identification

Truth tables are prepared for each test type with interpretations.  Results falling outside these ranges will require manual review and manual interpretation by a user with an appropriate level of privilege (usually senior technologist, supervisor, or transfusion physician.)

Unlike patient D typing, we want to detect partial or variant D types as D-positive since theoretically even a few epitopes of D present may be immunogenic to the patient.  In patient D typing, we can call partial D types as D-negative and use D-negative RBCs.  We don’t want to use partial D RBCs for D-negative women of child-bearing age!

This series will show several different test algorithms including both manual and automated methods.  The criteria for acceptability of the reactions are based on the manufacturers’ recommendations. 

Reflex ordering of antibody identification will occur if the antibody screen is non-negative.

28/9/20

Donor Center Materials and Equipment Strategy

drzeyd

This is the policy I developed for HMC Doha Blood Donor Center:

Policy:

  1. This policy applies to all blood donor processing (including reagents, materials, equipment) in the Blood Donor Center.
    1. Immunohematology testing and donor infectious disease marker testing are not included.
  2. Equipment and reagents must be selected to meet/exceed productions standards set by the Council of Europe, International AABB, HMC policies and procedures, and Qatari law.
  3. Each equipment must have a fully functioning, reliable, bidirectional interface to Medinfo Hematos IIG and be fully interfaced
    1. Vendor is responsible to pay for the interface licensing for each piece of equipment.
  4. Materials/reagents/equipment must cover the following functionalities:
    1. Automated separation of whole blood and apheresis components into:
      1. Packed RBCs in additive solution
      2. Buffy coat derived platelet pools
      3. Apheresis-derived platelets, plasma, and/or RBCs
      4. Fresh frozen and FP24 plasma
    2. Pathogen inactivation of whole blood, platelets, plasma, RBCs
    3. Cryoprecipitate
    4. Cryo-poor plasma
    5. Frozen RBCs (high-glycerol method)
    6. Washed RBCs
    7. Thawed plasma
    8. Irradiated RBCs
    9. Reconstituted whole blood (PRBCs and thawed plasma)
    10. Leukodepletion of ALL components to current and future CE standards
  5. Equipment must have/meet:
    1. CE mark or equivalent (FDA, CSA, etc.)
    2. Sufficient throughput for the workload in the area assigned
    3. Scalability:  A path of upgrading to larger capacity/throughput equipment using the same reagent line of the vendor
    4. A minimum of two of each equipment type must be obtained to minimize disruption of blood supply.
  6. Vendors:
    1. Vendors must offer 24/7 service on critical equipment for donor blood component and patient compatibility testing
    2. Vendors who do not meet qualification standards must not be used.

References:

  1. Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, Current Edition, AABB, Bethesda, MD, USA
  2. Guide to the Preparation, Use, and Quality Assurance of Blood Components, European Committee (Partial Agreement) on Blood Transfusion (CD-P-TS), European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Healthcare, Current Edition, Strasbourg, France

External Disaster Plan

drzeyd

Principle:

Maintaining an adequate blood supply and expedited compatibility testing are critical in disaster planning.  This plan is assuming that the Blood Donor Center is functional and can process donors and make components.

Medinfo Hematos IIG System is critical to monitoring inventory, preparing blood components expeditiously using Good Manufacturing Processes, and distributing blood components in a timely controlled manner.

Policy:

  1. Determinate total available blood supply across all locations by using the Cumulative Stock Display program in Medinfo Hematos IIG.
    1. Recheck stock at least every hour during the disaster.
  2. At each transfusion service site, in conjunction with the Transfusion Medicine Consultant:
    1. Cancel reservations for elective surgical and non-emergency medical cases of affected ABO/D types.
    2. Retain reservations for antigen-matched, oncology, NICU, and high-risk obstetrical cases.
  3. Inform Manager for Donor Recruitment/Logistics to send SMS, radio, and television messages for blood donors—all types.
  4. Contact ALL staff and have them report to duty.
    1. At Blood Donor Center, the Head Nurse, Recruitment Manager, Supervisor, Component Processing, and Supervisor, Marker Testing will contact their respective staff.
    2. At various hospital blood bank transfusion services, the site supervisor will contact all staff.
  5. Process blood components using automated component technology (Reveos).
  6. Perform all donor marker testing including single-well NAT.
    1. Abbreviation of donor testing is only at the discretion of the Head, Transfusion Medicine.
  7. Send blood components using Inter-Depot Transfer function of Medinfo.
  8. Transfusion Services:
    1. Release blood component according to the various protocols as needed:
      1. Massive transfusion protocol
      2. Emergency release
      3. STAT
      4. Priority
      5. Routine
  9. Compatibility testing will be electronic, immediate-spin, or full AHG as per our protocols.

References:

  1. Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, Current Edition, AABB, Bethesda, MD, USA
  2. Guidelines to the Preparation, Use, and Quality Assurance of Blood Components, European Committee (Partial Agreement) on Blood Transfusion (CD-P-TS), Current Edition

Revised 10/9/20

Review of Product Inserts

drzeyd

This is a policy I made for NGHA Jeddah many years ago but is still useful today.

Principle:

All technical staff are required to read and understand the manufacturer package inserts that apply to the procedures that they perform.  This policy establishes a means of documenting compliance with this requirement.

Policy Details:

  1. Technical staff are defined as anyone who uses the reagent in the performance of a procedure or process or anyone reviews or supervises that process or procedure.  This includes the supervisor, medical technologists, medical technicians, nurses, phlebotomists, and assistants.
  2. All technical staff are required to read and understand ALL product inserts for each procedure applicable to the section(s) that they work in—apheresis, donor room, component preparation, and/or transfusion service.
  3. If they have any questions about a particular insert, they should refer it to the supervisor, senior technologist (Med Tech 1), or in the latter’s absence, the blood bank medical director/section head.
  4. Each staff member must sign the Manufacturer’s Package Insert Review Form for that particular policy/procedure, including his signature, employee identification number, and date.
  5. Each Manufacturer’s Package Insert Review Form will be retained with a copy of the package insert by the Blood Bank Supervisor in a special file while the material is being used and for at least five (5) years after a new or revised manufacturer package insert is applicable.
  6. A new Manufacturer’s Package Insert Review Form should be used for each revision of the insert.

Insert Review Form

Type of Insert:  New  Revised
Product Name:
Date of Insert:

I have read this insert and understand its contents and accept responsibility for following its instructions and directions.

Staff Name & Badge #–PRINT!SignatureDate
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Sample Resident Examination for Donor Center

drzeyd

Reading Assignments:

  • Chapters 5-9:  Blood Donation and Collection in Technical Manual, 16th Edition
  • Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, AABB, 25th Edition

Study Questions:

  1. Which of the following candidates is acceptable for donation?
    1. Saudi, visited Sudan 11 months ago as part of National Guard exchange
    2. Saudi former student lived in UK for 2 years from 1993-95
    3. Normotensive taking amlodipine and valsartan
    4. Psoriatic using Tegison
    5. Male adult using ibuprofen for lower back pain
    6. Female 4 weeks post-partum
    7. Husband of patient with recent onset of hepatitis B infection
    8. Male stopped taking ampicillin one week ago for acute pharyngitis
    9. Donor with WBC count 12000/cmm but otherwise normal
  2. Which of the following donors is suitable for autologous donation?
    1. Cataract surgery patient
    2. Well, but had gastroenteritis 3 days ago
    3. Pregnant with Hgb 11 g/dl
    4. CGL patient with Hgb 13 g/dl
    5. Hodgkin’s disease patient Hgb 12 for exploratory laparotomy
    6. Patient with rare antibody anti-Tja, Hgb 13 for cholecystecomy
  3. How do you handle the following events?
    1. Donor draw fills bag with bright red blood in 30 seconds
    2. Donor faints when needle is shown
    3. Lipemic serum during donor plateletpheresis session
    4. Donor with numbness and tingling of extremities during donor apheresis session
  4. How would you handle the following therapeutic phlebotomy requests?
    1. Hgb 22 g/dl, suspected polycythemia rubra vera
    2. Hgb 13, suspected hemochromatosis patient
    3. Hgb 16, renal failure patient post-erythropoietin treatment
    4. Unstable angina, Hgb 9
  5. What is the final volume of each of the following blood components?
    1. Whole blood
    2. Packed RBCs—state hematocrit as well
    3. Washed RBCs
    4. Irradiated packed cells
    5. Platelet pool—state number of platelets
    6. FFP
    7. Cryo-poor plasma
    8. Cryoprecipitate
  6. What are the outdates of each of the following components?
    1. Packed RBCs
    2. Platelet pool
    3. FFP frozen at -35C
    4. Granulocyte concentrate
  7. Which donor units are acceptable for transfusion?
    1. HBsAg negative, HBcAb positive, HBsAb > 20 IU/liter
    2. HCV Ab positive, RIBA-3 negative, HCV-RNA negative
    3. Syphilis positive, FTA-ABS negative

Revised:

29/8/20

Advanced Hematology Resident Training in Donor Center and Apheresis

drzeyd

Objectives:

  1. Donor criteria based on AABB standards
    1. Is it safe for the donor to donate?
    2. Medical history
      1. Current medical conditions
      2. Past medical conditions
  2. Medications
  3. Vaccinations
  4. Travel history
  5. High-risk behaviors
  6. SARS/MERS
  7. COVID-19 convalescent plasma CCP
  8. Prion diseases
  9. Donor medical examination
  10. Is it safe for the recipient to receive the donor’s blood?
  11. Donor registration issues
    1. Positive identification
    2. Donor deferral database
  12. Donor phlebotomy
    1. Safe volume to donate
    2. Anticoagulant-preservative solutions
    3. Time limit for phlebotomy
    4. Post-donation care
  13. Donor reactions—Dx and Rx of the following:
    1. Vasovagal
    2. Seizures
    3. Air embolism
    4. Arterial stick
    5. Hematoma
  14. Donor Apheresis
    1. Plateletpheresis
    2. Plasmapheresis
    3. Plateletpheresis with concurrent plasma collection
    4. RBC collection
    5. Combined platelet, plasma, and RBC collection
  15. Autologous donation
    1. Predeposit
    2. Perioperative
    3. Intraoperative
    4. Postoperative
  16. Donor self-deferral
  17. Therapeutic Phlebotomy
  18. Therapeutic Apheresis
    1. Therapeutic plasma exchange/plasmapheresis
    2. Leukapheresis
    3. Thrombapheresis
    4. Red cell exchange
    5. Stem cell collection
    6. Column absorption technologies
    7. Clinical indications
    8. Writing orders for above procedures
  19. Component Processing:
    1. Manual
    2. Automated—Reveos
    3. Pathogen Inactivation Mirasol
    4. Buffy coat vs classic platelet-rich plasma platelets and pools
    5. Platelet Additive Solution PAS
    6. FFP, FP24, thawed plasma
    7. Cryoprecipitate
    8. Cryo-poor plasma (plasma, cryoprecipitate-removed)
    9. COVID-19 convalescent plasma CCP

Clinical Responsibilities (after proven competence):

  1. Triage of donor requests
  2. Handling of donor reactions
  3. Approval of therapeutic phlebotomies
  4. Assistance with therapeutic apheresis

Assessments:

  1. Pre-training/baseline
  2. Competency documentation for clinical responsibilities (#11 above)
  3. Post-training

Working Hours:

  1. 0900-1700, Saturday through Wednesday
  2. Must carry pager for clinical responsibilities

Reviewed 17/8/20

Basic Hematology Fellowship Rotation in Transfusion Medicine

drzeyd

Objectives:

  1. Donor Center
    1. Donor eligibility criteria
    2. Whole blood collection
    3. Donor apheresis (platelets, plasma, dual-RBC)
    4. Donor reactions
  2. Therapeutic Apheresis
    1. Plasma exchange
    2. Leukocyte reduction—stem cell collection
    3. Reductive thrombapheresis
    4. RBC exchange
    5. Column-absorption procedures including phototherapy
  3. Component Preparation
    1. Preparation and release issues
  4. Transfusion Service:
    1. Blood component therapy
    2. RBC blood groups
    3. Compatibility Testing
    4. Antibody Identification and clinical significance
    5. Transfusion reactions
    6. Direct antiglobulin test clinical significance
    7. Drug-related hemolysis

Venue:

TMS Donor and Transfusion Services

Conducted by:  Head, TMS, and senior TMS technical staff

Evaluation:

Discussion of topics with TMS Head and written final examination

Source Materials:

  1. Technical Manual, AABB
  2. Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, AABB
  3. Apheresis, Principles and Practice, AABB

This is a full-time, one-month rotation—attendance in mandatory.  Vacations should NOT be taken during this rotation.

Originally Prepared for NGHA Riyadh 31/3/09

Reviewed 26/8/20

My Opinion: Separate Transfusion Medicine from the Laboratory

drzeyd

Transfusion Medicine includes laboratory and non-laboratory functions.  The non-laboratory and purely clinical functions are unique and have no analogy within the general laboratory.

The transfusion service/hospital blood bank laboratory is the closest to a laboratory operation, but there is component modification and complex manual testing, especially for reference immunohematology testing.  The staff must make detailed manual decisions, the errors for which could be life-threatening for the patient.

The blood donor center manufactures a pharmaceutical, i.e. blood components with collection, donor qualification, donor abnormal results review, infectious disease marker testing, component production, and donor immunohematology testing—all subject to Good Manufacturing Practices.  Never forget:  Blood is a drug!!

No other laboratory section is directly responsible for treatment of critically ill patients.  Therapeutic apheresis is essential for organ and stem-cell transplants, nephrology, neurology, etc.  No other laboratory section is directly responsible for treatment of critically ill patients.  Transfusion Medicine physicians are functioning as intensivists.  There is no hiding in the laboratory from clinical medicine.

There may also be an industrial manufacturing plant to extract various blood derivatives (e.g. factor concentrates, albumin, Rh immune globulin, etc.)  This is pharmaceutical manufacturing on a large-scale basis.  There is medical, technical, and special administrative expertise.

Many functions may operate 24/7.  The transfusion medicine physician may be on-call for donor issues and review of complex immunohematology problems to acutely decide which blood component (and phenotype) should be given as well as review all adverse reactions to transfusion.

The unique blend of clinical skills is unlike anything else in the laboratory.  Also, those outside the blood bank rarely have the skills or judgments for the best course of action for transfusion medicine or for its operations.

The clinical transfusion medicine physician must make acute, life-threatening decisions unlike anyone else in the laboratory.  The blood bank technologist is at the cutting edge of the battle with his testing and interpretations.  No other area of the laboratory is at such risk for injuring or even killing the patient.  There is high stress and burn-out.

I have talked with many blood bankers and many seem to share the exasperation that the laboratory does not understand us.  The latter looks at blood bank testing like that coming off a hematology or chemistry analyzer—although patients rarely would have severe morbidity or mortality like the blood bank from errors in those analyzers.

No laboratory pathologist has the pressure of the blood bank physician on-call.  It really is 24/7 and requires a broad, clinical background to make the right decisions.  It is very stressful and does not permit a good night’s sleep.

Thus, I make my case to separate us from the laboratory.  We can form our own more effective administrative organization and optimize our own planning.  Regretfully, I have never worked in such an administrative structure.  I also am a realist that cost-containment nowadays makes it much less likely high administration would permit this change for a mere cost center.  This will probably never happen during my career.

Finally, Transfusion Medicine is an essential service.  Blood components are essential drugs.  The operations and staff must be free of political influences.  This is a service for the entire region or country like the fire department, civil defense, etc.

8/8/20