Includes patient, donor, apheresis and related IT topics
The attached exam (8 questions) was given to my medical technologists, resident/fellows, and medical technology students to assess their knowledge of the Rh system:
They also had to explain what phenotypes are represented by R1, R2, r, Rz, r’, and r’’ terminology.
This is an update of a previous post.
The final components from the component preparation center may be sent to various depots (freestanding location and/or hospital blood banks. There should be complete traceability for every step (from donor reception, collection, testing, and processing) transport between locations, and finally the exact storage site, which might include which refrigerator/freezer/incubator and even shelf/position number for each component is stored. The end of that document showed rules for type/antigen matching.
For disaster planning, rapid inventory enumeration by type is very important. This can be very time-consuming manually. With our Medinfo Hematos blood bank system, we could quickly get total inventory across the Qatar or by hospital in less than one minute. We could also quickly find antigen-matched units across the system and reserve it at any one site for another if necessary.
Smart blood bank dispensing refrigerators, as offered by Haemonetics and Angelatoni, may also serve as depots and take the place of a hospital blood bank for some dispensing. These solutions can also capture vital information about the storage conditions of the components and prevent release if the storage criteria are not met. They can also interface with blood bank computer systems and use the main system’s logic for the dispensation rules.
Upon receipt at the hospitals from the blood processing center, the forward ABO and D typing must be confirmed. We used D reagents which detected partial D so we would call such donor units as D-positive. However, if a patient type reagent insensitive to partial D types is used, it is possible for a unit to be typed as D-negative whereas in the donor center it might be D-positive. Sometimes, nothing types consistently as D-positive: all you can say is that with a particular reagent and lot number, there is or isn’t reactivity.
The greatest complexity is for RBCs since potentially so many antigens exist. Criteria for matching/ignoring certain antigens must be made. Critically significant antibodies such as the Kell, Duffy, Kidd, and certain Rh (D and c) must be antigen matched. A robust blood bank computer system can enforce these rules.
For other components, antigen/typing may be less important. In fact, in most situations, any type of platelets can be given to anyone (except neonates). Despite the potentially incompatible plasma, there is rarely significant hemolysis. In fact, if pooling platelets without regard to blood types is done, a platelet transfusion is a common cause of a positive direct antiglobulin test DAT—something that is not clinically significant. No one died of a positive DAT by itself for this reason.
Specific rules for compatible plasma types are important, but nowadays, low-anti-B-titer group A plasma may be used like universal AB plasma. The challenge is to be able to perform the ABO titration (specifically anti-B) quickly—titration can be a slow process, even with automated equipment. A similar situation for low-titer, universal group O whole blood requires both anti-A and anti-B titration (I will return to this topic in a future post).
This is the final part of a medical student lecture I gave at National Guard Health Affairs in Riyadh.
This is part 4 of a lecture I made for medical students at National Guard Health Affairs in Riyadh. This assumes a completely manual system and does not include ISBT labels or new universal-group components (low-titer group O whole blood or low-B-titer group A plasma).
This is part 3 of a lecture I made for medical students at National Guard Health Affairs in Riyadh. This assumes a completely manual system and does not include ISBT labels or new universal-group components (low-titer group O whole blood or low-B-titer group A plasma).
This is part 2 of a lecture I made for medical students at National Guard Health Affairs in Riyadh. This assumes a completely manual system and does not include ISBT labels or new universal-group components (low-titer group O whole blood or low-B-titer group A plasma).
This is the first part of a medical student lecture I gave at National Guard Health Affairs in Riyadh. The lecture was given before we had a blood bank computer system and shows manual processes.
Rh immunoprophylaxis has big effect on the Transfusion Medicine operations. With a very active obstetrics program, there are numerous prenatal blood bank workups and administrations of Rh immune globulin RhIG—and consequently many antibody identifications. In fact at my previous position, the largest single source of antibody workups was from patients post-RhIG administration.
As a result of the antenatal RhIG use, there were numerous positive antibody screens. Our policy had been to always do a full antibody identification, both AHG and enzyme panels, and this made up the bulk of our antibody testing. In my experience, I have found other antibody specificities in some of these patients, including anti-Kell and anti-c, both of which could be very clinically significant.
As part of the workup, we also did ABO and extended Rh and Kell phenotyping, and thus identified rare Rh phenotypes (r’r’, -D-, etc.) and several Bombay phenotypes.
Unfortunately, I have been at institutions where they assumed a positive antibody screen in a patient with recent RhIG administration was passive anti-D and did NOT perform further testing.
If the patient needs blood and the antibody screen is positive, the antibody workup must be performed for routine release. This means about a 20-30 minutes delay in release until the antibody panels are completed and reviewed. Otherwise, blood can be released through an emergency protocol if the clinician accepts responsibility for incomplete testing at the time of release.
Many clinicians refused to do this emergency release and insisted on waiting for the antibody identification before accepting RBC components. They would not take the responsibility for the emergency release.
If we had done the antibody workup in these RhIG patients, we would have identified the anti-D, and I as the transfusion medicine physician would then advise the clinician to accept emergency release of RBCs while we complete the antibody workup.
For this reason alone, I insisted on a full antibody workup for all RhIG patients RhIG who exhibit a positive antibody screen. I would be comfortable in recommending emergency release if I had results of the previous antibody identification showing passive anti-D. The delay in release could adversely affect the patient’s outcome if there is active bleeding.
In summary, if a patient has a positive antibody screen post RhIG administration, you should still do ABID to rule out other antibodies and facilitate release of RBCs to a bleeding patient.
Process: Donor Collection
Zeyd Merenkov, MD, FCAP, FASCP
Independent Consultant in Transfusion Medicine
5.4.1 PROCESS DONOR COLLECTION:
Process:
References:
5.4 POLICY: DONOR COLLECTION
Policy:
References:
Dr. Zeyd Merenkov 