



Includes therapeutic and donor apheresis




I designed a completely quarantined process for collection, processing, and release of CCP at HMC Doha. This document shows the Medinfo process for site registration as a separate donor center code.


CCP could only be collected at this special site and only the apheresis bag could be used for collection. Regular donation options were not available at this CCP site nor was CCP collection an option at the regular donation sites.
4/1/21
This has been revised to recommend the use of a continuously recording portable vital signs device such as Umana’s UT1M (GPI, Italia) which includes PAO2 and heart rhythm measurements.
Principle:
All therapeutic apheresis procedures are potentially life-threatening and must only occur by an order from a transfusion medicine physician with experience/competence in such procedures.
Definitions:
Policy:
References:
Revised 3/1/21
It now has been over eight 8 months since I prepared the CCP workflow in Medinfo. It was built on the framework of the manual CCP process including donor prescreening with an abbreviated donor questionnaire. It was really quite simple and used the donor and patient modules to create quarantine areas for donor screening, collection, processing, and hospital patient blood bank release.
Here are my current comments on the process:
Donor Qualification:
I would still exclude malaria and HTLV from the donor questionnaire and would update to UDQ 2.1. Since these donors have recovered from a potentially life-threatening illness, I would keep the Hgb threshold at 11 g/dl.
Donor Collection:
In the future, I would consider using one of the soon-to-be-released portable devices that continuously monitor vital signs with pO2 and EKG lead to rule out asymptomatic pulmonary or cardiac problems.
I would also consider using low-ABO-titer, group A, universally to meet the demand for group B and AB patients.
Donor Testing:
There is still no need to segregate and separately test CCP donor specimens from regular blood donor specimens. I would perform SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing and set a threshold for qualifying donors—that threshold will be based on the manufacturer’s recommendations. However, if the treating physician wanted to use a low-titer unit, I would permit this.
Donor Processing:
There is no need to change this from the current processes. Keep the CCP processing separate from the regular operations.
CCP Plasma Release:
I would keep the quarantine release and restrict it to the locations used for treating COVID-19 patients
Medinfo Software Modifications:
I would record the IgG and IgM titers for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in each donation record. This would include testing and entering the results on donations prior to this testing. ISBT labels should include this antibody titer.
Hospital Information Software Modifications:
Set up restricted CCP ordering for the actual treating physicians only. Also provide the ISBT code and shortened descriptors to it if necessary (certain HIS vendors still cannot read ISBT codes natively).
The original CCP workflow is attached for reference.

All blood components are considered medications and are subject to Good Manufacturing Practices as mandated by international accreditation standards. The whole process must be done reproducibly and precisely by specific personnel trained and documented to be competent. This includes collection of convalescent COVID-19 plasma.
Transfusion Medicine will provide staff who are deemed competent for the entire process of the collection, manufacture, and release of this unlicensed, emergency-contingency component.
It will help greatly if all candidates are prescreened to exclude the following candidates:
This is NOT a complete list of criteria. Transfusion Medicine personnel will screen according to the full donor criteria. Thus, donors passing the pre-screening may still be otherwise disqualified based on the detailed process.
Setting up ABO-incompatible renal transplants is a major undertaking and requires close coordination between Transfusion Medicine and the clinical team. This post addresses my experience in setting up this program in 2019 at HMC in Qatar.
Like any process involving titration, it is best to automate it to minimize inter-technologist variability. Unfortunately, doing both IgG and IgM titers takes up to 1 hour per machine and totally monopolizes the machine during that interval. I did not have sufficient staff to even consider doing the titrations manually. Performing automated titers disrupted my workflow so I encouraged the clinicians to send the specimens for off-peak processing.
Titration:
Columns:
Apheresis Equipment:
Staffing:
Specimen Collection:
Table of Permissible ABO Types:
Software:
Selection of blood component for ABO-incompatible renal transplantation is discussed in a separate post that will follow.
25/12/20
I am attaching the US Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research CBER Guidance for Industry revision dated December 2020 to replace the one issued in September 2019.
This is a very detailed document that will require US blood centers to comply with newer more stringent safeguards to minimize the risk of bacterial contamination of platelet components.
The easiest way to comply is to universally pathogen-inactivate all platelet components: then the rest of the algorithm does not apply. I am happy that for over 10 years I have used pathogen-inactivation (riboflavin-based Mirasol, Terumo BCT) and not experienced any bacterial sepsis from platelet or plasma components.
For those of us practicing outside the USA, please note:
The US still does not permit pooled, buffy coat platelets to have either a 5 or 7 day outdate. For pooled components stored at 20-24 C, the FDA only allows a four-hour outdate, regardless what the rest of the world permits. Thus, the USA mainly uses apheresis platelets.
If you have pathogen-inactivated platelets, you are so fortunate that you don’t have to follow these other recommendations to have a low risk of bacterial contamination.
Reference:
Bacterial Risk Control Strategies for Blood Collection Establishments and Transfusion Services to Enhance the Safety and Availability of Platelets for Transfusion, Guidance for Industry, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, September 2019 updated December 2020
CBER Guidance for Bacterial Contamination Guidance, Revised December 2020 (PDF)
I will be posting a detailed series about the manual and software-enhanced COVID-19 processes that I set up in Qatar at HMC Doha in March-April 2020.
In this series I will provide you with screen shots of my Medinfo Hematos IIG software design for each step in the process: collection, processing, testing, inter-depot transfer, and hospital transfusion service/blood bank release.
This GMP-compliant software-enhanced system is based on the manual system I set up in early March 2020 at HMC.
I want to thank Medinfo Hematos IIG for their rapid response to building this parallel system based on my standard processes in so short a time (two weeks) and my special thanks to the software engineering team at Vital Health Technologies, the agent for Medinfo in Qatar.
To start the series, I am providing the basic workflow for the system. As is normal in Medinfo software design, a full mapping of the processes are made. This workflow shows the new CCP ISBT codes and the quarantine collection and processing steps. The donor testing (marker and immunohematology) processes are similar to those for regular donor units.
This is basically the same process both manually and in the software. I always say:
A good software process is based on a good manual process!!
Please note the following workflow for our initial discussion.

This form is the result of a collaborative effort between my therapeutic apheresis team and me. I want to thank Dr. Saloua Al Hmissi, Consultant, Transfusion Medicine, and Ms. Mini Paul, Head Apheresis Nurse for all their efforts.
This form can be readily converted into a computer data entry form–depending on your software’s capabilities.



Principle:
Since group AB plasma is in short supply, use of group A plasma with low anti-B titers may be substituted based on inventory levels.
Policy:
References: